Although past work (Hatfield, Luckhurst, & Rapson, 2011; Leigh, 1989; Whitley, 1988) has theorized about possible variations in intimate motivations centered on women’s intimate identities, this research could be the very first to present empirical proof that ladies’s first intimate encounters with a lady partner are initiated for mostly similar motives, no matter their self-reported intimate identification in young adulthood. The exclusion is MH and LGB females had a tendency to report greater motivations pertaining to closeness and exploration, when compared with EH females, to be appropriate due to their very first contact that is same-sex.
Present findings also revealed that, despite mostly comparable motivations for participating in very first intimate connection with a same-sex partner, when compared with MH and LGB ladies, EH-identified women reported being more youthful during the time of their very first same-sex contact, involved in less intimate tasks using their feminine partner, and had been prone to be intoxicated by drugs/alcohol.
And LGB peers to engage passively in a comparatively tiny amount of sexual tasks with a detailed friend that is female the impact of liquor and/or medications in their very very first intimate encounter with a female (see also Yost & McCarthy, 2012). One implication of EH ladies’ distinct experiential results is they will come to look at their very first same-sex encounter that is sexual less relevant for informing their intimate identification than their MH and LGB peers, perhaps attributing their initial intimate encounter with a lady friend to your “heat associated with the moment” or a result of their alcohol or other drug use.
Intimate minority females, on the other side hand, engaged in an excellent selection of intimate tasks and were older at chronilogical age of very very first same-sex encounter that is sexual to EH females. Read More